Pushing Rope: Internet Stalking Is Real

Pushing Rope: Internet Stalking Is Real

It is VERY REAL. I am currently being stalked about my person as are my family members to some degree and I have been (and probably am now) stalked online. I choose to deal with it by ignoring it or videotaping it; however the feeling moves me.

Sometimes I take whole months off and ignore it completely.

I will NEVER let anyone steal my bandwidth in this way emotionally or mentally or physically and I am happy to publicize this matter.

I'm sorry for any of the victims of this. Ignoring it is not ideal but it works for me. Certainly it can be amusing to then watch the calisthenics they go through trying to get your attention ...

like children on a playground ....

only not innocent.

like BULLIES on a playground ....

It can be very difficult to prove stalking but it can be done.

If it effects your income or your ability to do business -- (and it can!!) OR, if it is a pattern practiced by a large group of people or people with an organized agenda in mind; you might consider taking action with a RICO attorney. If their site is collecting money, the fit begins.

RICO isn't just for traffickers and such. It's also designed and utilized for self-defense of citizens against those who harass, threaten and stalk them.

Look into it if it effects you in any way.

There is always a reason why people would choose to do this to you. Think what that is.

And, take care of yourself.

about IMPEACHMENT : A Bone to Pick with Thom Hartmann

UPDATE 3-10-07: Sad, but True ---



But, the sun still comes up in Vermont !!! (and for those of us who LOVE America)

I MISS AMERICA !!!




Bush is OVER



Impeachment Vote is coming SOON SOON SOON !!!!I'm not shouting ... hehe



As many of you likely know Air America has recently been through a buy out and although they are not exactly progressive they still lean to the left.

The boyfriend is a big fan of Thom Hartmann and I'm just not sure about him (TH) yet, but, I also get the above information from the BF about the buyout which I'm researching as I talk. The giver of info... (bf) is so smart and he knows and retains SO MUCH stuff that I can't always remember the details ...

He loves Randi Rhodes.

He is VERY HAPPY that Thom Hartmann is going on the air opposite the Rush Limpaugh show to keep things balanced.

So --- needless to say we spend some time with Thom Hartmann. (mmmmhmmmm)

The other morning I sat aghast listening to Mr. Hartmann say that NM Gov. Bill Richardson would NEVER sign the 'bill' petitioning for the Impeachment of this regime. This is Senate JR 5 currently working it's way through step after step to become reality in Impeaching this regime.

I went on a mad hunt for which state would prove the most likely to get a Gov. to sign the bill (it was starting to make sense to me that a Gov. would have to sign a bill) Meanwhile, the back of my head kept repeating that the Jefferson Manual does not call for the Governor to sign. This is a RESOLUTION, not a BILL.

Finally, I called upon my friend David Swanson whom everyone can rely on for the most current and correct information concerning Impeachment and he reiterated my belief that a Governor does not need to sign for this resolution to pass.

Phew !!! --- crisis in my head averted .... (some of you KNOW what this means to America and can understand what I mean by that)

It is VERY VERY VERY notable that I have been watching this bill through New Mexico's bill-watcher and after all this time -- the site is down today for the first time !!!! Most exciting is this email I received. (and there's no Confidentiality DISCLAIMER though frankly from the reading I've done that's just to protect the company from liability not the writer and, as well, that chain was broken on the first link)
So, here's the email .....

bill.watcher@legis.gov Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com
Subject: Legislative Council Service Bill Watcher
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:40:20 -0600

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL

There has been a recent legislative action on the following
legislation:
SJR5 IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH

To view your bills go to http://legis.state.nm.us:8080/billwatcher

Like I said: This is the FIRST time this link has failed. EVER. Action taken the last three times I received these emails passed the resolution on through to the next committee. Originally, all these hurdles were placed in front of it which tells you that no matter what we are going to rid ourselves of this president and let the world know that we know he is WRONG. AND, it's in front of the full Senate next. Action taken means ONE THING: IMPEACHMENT WILL BEGIN !!!!!!!!!!!

Here's a lady who was live-bloggin from the room as the vote was taken to start Impeachment. (this is probably why Cheney will resign and george will pick a new boze [horrors don't let it be alberto eichie gonzalez] and then we'll be stuck with him because we are impeaching george and dick and dick will no longer be with us. oooooh this is a slippery cabal, ain't it??

Thom???? For God's sake man, it's upsetting that you don't know that a Governor was not needed to sign this ... even I was thrown and I have read Jefferson's Rules on this til my green eyes are red.

But, maybe I needed a good scare not to take this for granted...


You do not need a governor for a state legislature to petition the US House to impeach

Here's lots of info
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/resourcecenter
Here's the specific rule
http://www.impeachbush.tv/impeach/statebasis.html



THE LIVE BLOGGER SAYS THAT THIS PETITION FOR IMPEACHMENT WILL BE TAKEN UP WITHIN 48 HOURS last she heard. This means Impeachment could begin WITHIN DAYS --- MOMENTS ---- HOURS ---- !!!!!!

Because her post is dated the FIFTH


EXCERPT

Now we have to find out when the full Seante Vote will be. I was originally told it happens within 48 hours, but I have to call Majority Leeader Sanchez tomorrow.

Later all, time to eat.

Posted by: Linda | Mar 5, 2007 9:10:48 PM

Today is THE EIGHTH --- I received the email about 'action' on the SEVENTH !!! (at 6pm) and the link it kaput ....

I am searching all over for news of this ... but I believe that Impeachment has just become a reality .......

Thank GOD before someone had to give him a blowjob.... (sorry for the mental pic)

And, I'll close with gratitude for Thomas Jefferson. It really matters NOT what revisionist historians try to do to this man and his reputation --- his words and works outlived him and his wisdom provided us a way to save our country no matter what. He and my Grandpa are my only true heroes ! (there are a few others but they are all related to me, including some younger ones)

I wish he had been President of Tampa.

Oh, and I'm RIGHT --- Impeachment Vote is coming SOON SOON SOON !!!!I'm not shouting ... hehe

Kuhn's Employees Julie Brown Campaign Donations being Investigated

State Is Investigating Car Dealer's Donations To Council Candidate
(byline from the Tampa Tribune --- see below for entire article)

ANOTHER UPDATE 3-8-07 2:55 P.M. After I posted the below I received two more emails from Ms. Brown but included at the bottom of the emails (THIS TIME) along with her corporate title and six lines of corporate status (although from the SAME EMAIL ADDRESS as yesterday which I did NOT disclose) is some type of warning along the lines of ... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. Don't copy this !!! In other words, another veiled threat. Not to copy or distribute or etc ... I'm just wondering --- why was that notice not on her email from yesterday? Is this something new just for me for today? The timing is rather odd considering the emails arrived about ten -- thirty minutes after I posted the below. This is all the time I have for this. I do not like to be threatened.

It should be noted that there has been much revelation about the developer connects of the one and the threatened status of the other due to developers. And that people ARE STILL allowed to formulate and state personal opinions. No matter what George says.

UPDATE: 3-7-07 I am editing the title to this article NOT because I believe it to be misleading but because Ms. Brown felt it was misleading and asked nicely. Well --- AND she also threatened legal action which does not bother me in the least. When she said please it prompted me to call a few folks and ask what they had heard from her and take opinions. People could learn from Ms. Julie Brown. Good surface manners and civility take you places that all the shoving and threats in the world will never accomplish.

However, though it is splitting fine hairs and I took my title exactly from the Tampa Tribune article --- instead of it reading "Julie Brown being investigated for Kuhn donations" --I'll say "Kuhn's Julie Brown Campaign Donations being Investigated" So be it. I'm not sure how you can investigate one half a transaction. He did something wrong, perhaps. Perhaps she went along with it. I think that's all that was said. There's an investigation starting that may lead to an investigation.
Maybe more money will change hands .... who knows?

That's not my fault, now; is it?

UPDATE 3-8-07 I totally DONT GET how ANY candidate can pretend not to know where their money comes from and the lack of propriety therein. Like they are all distant from their bank account. Right. That's beyond belief. And, I am entitled to my opinion.

As well (see below) even though Ms. Brown asked me to 'read the article' -- it's really NOT very clear WHO is being investigated. It IS CLEAR WHAT is being investigated ... it is being investigated that some money changed hands in the midst of a campaign and it was felt to be illegal by more than one person and also not reported on openly by the Tampa Tribune and apparently the complaint bore enough weight to start an investigation. So, money that changed hands between Ms. Brown and Mr. Kuhn and his employees is being investigated by the FDLE. Since both parties participated in this action : one the hand out, the other the hand outstretched --- it would seem that all facets of the cash exchange are being investigated. I guess this could go on all day. It's my personal and humble opinion that ENCAPSULATED in the WHAT is the WHO .... I happen to believe this is an (typical of Hillsborough County) attempt to stifle free speech and truth --- but, like I said, since she asked nicely --- and claimed she was not being investigated --- I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. Short of calling FDLE and seeing exactly WHO is being investigated ....

I DID NOT appreciate it that she apparently cc'd her email to ME to others and I did ask her several questions in a follow-up email which she did not reply to, again typical of others who make threats and then do not respond to queries for clarification.

But, maybe she is busy.

Now, if Jason Kuhn contacts me and says 'this is misleading and I want you to change the title' ..... I'm going to contact the FDLE and see just WHO or WHAT is going on. Because I'm not in the habit of retracting the truth and I won't do it and this is not a retraction. More a favor to someone who asked nicely. Three major columnists at three different major papers covered this issue ... numerous times. I did contact two of them and they have not heard from Julie Brown concerning this issue. Why? Because I am the little guy? hmmmmmm
Or is there a connection between my house and some on her campaign donor list? Subject for another day.

Why did the Tampa Tribune help to keep all this quiet while St Pete Times and Wayne Garcia were covering it? It can't be attributed to lazy journalism in this case because Mr. Poltilove was extremely responsive to my query.

One final note: I did change the title to this article yesterday afternoon, because Ms. Brown stated that SHE is not being investigated. But, then I realized that unless I re-published this in entirety that the URL would forever say what it did previously. As a courtesy, although it is time-consuming; I am 'drafting' the original and re-publishing the entire article with explanation.

Here is the email from Ms. Brown: (I left out her email address as it appears to be her work email)

Subject: Please re-phrase title
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:41:41 -0500
From: "Brown, Julie"
View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
To: fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com

Please remove the heading to the attached article you posted on your website http://tampasbackdoor.blogspot.com/2007/02/julie-brown-being-investigated-for-kuhn.html.

It is inaccurate and is misleading. I AM NOT being investigated for Kuhn donations. Read the story which you posted. I will seek legal action if you do not remove it at once. Thank you.


Julie Brown, Esquire
Cellular phone: (removed)

Here is my email in reply:


Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:31:14 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fairy Tale Trash" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: Please re-phrase title
To: "Brown, Julie"

Dear Ms. Brown, I took the title straight from the Tampa Tribune. Are you saying that your campaign is not being investigated currently or that you were not being investigated at the time of the posting of the below referenced article (both articles referenced in this email communication as we published on the same day?) Because I took my heading precisely from what I read in the Tampa Tribune as quoted exactly in the article. Which states:
State Is Investigating Car Dealer's Donations To Council Candidate
Skip directly to the full story.

As well, since this piece of email went directly to my bulk mail folder where it was THIS CLOSE to being trashed away ... or lost after seven days this means you cc'd it to others. I would like to know who you cc'd it to. I believe if you intend to take legal action you should do better than that or you would have no proof that I ever received your email ... and as I said, it nearly got deleted. Then what? You would be assuming I would be ignoring your request when nothing could be further from the truth.
Also I would inquire as to what would please you for the article heading as I have an idea in mind but would like to know your preference before I edit it?
I believe I should view the mention of legal action as a threat but since you did say please I am perfectly willing to listen and perhaps I am mistaken and you did not mean it as a threat, at all.
Email communication is very difficult that way. Thank you for the communication and I look forward to your reply.
UPDATE: Ms. Brown, I just had a brief conversation with another party to this and believe I understand the nature of your problem with the heading. However, I would appreciate clarification from you as I would not like to set a precedent by changing some writings because someone threatens me. That's the nature of politics and journalism as accepted by all players, I guess. Sad but true.
Again, I look forward to your clarification and preference.
You should know that there are many places on the web where people revealed alot more about you than you'll find on my site or on sticks. They speak of your marriage, your connections, etc ... at any rate, this could be an endless task for you to threaten legal action where you felt you were wronged ...
people had plenty to say about this matter ...


TO WHICH I RECEIVED NO REPLY.

Not only did I re-title at her request, upon her word that she is not being investigated; I entirely re-published the article so that the URL would not read the original way, even though it was not requested -- as a courtesy.

It will be interesting to see how the chips fall.



By JOSH POLTILOVE The Tampa Tribune
Published: Feb 20, 2007
ADVERTISEMENT
More from this channel:
Search for more information:
Site Search Archives Keyword
TBO.com Site Search | Tribune archive from 1990





State Is Investigating Car Dealer's Donations To Council Candidate


By JOSH POLTILOVE The Tampa Tribune

Published: Feb 20, 2007

TAMPA - With almost $115,000 in her campaign coffers, first-time candidate Julie Brown is helping drive the most expensive race for Tampa City Council.

Reporter Josh Poltilove can be reached at (813) 835-2105.

ADDENDUM:

ROAD TO CITY HALL

Host Pulls Switcheroo

A builder's Tampa City Council fundraiser on Monday afternoon is expected to have a surprise guest: District 4 candidate Julie Brown.

Originally her opponent, incumbent John Dingfelder, was invited to attend the fundraising event along with one other candidate from each city council race. But Brown was called Monday morning and invited to attend instead of Dingfelder.

"I'm just excited by the positive change and support," she said.

Brown said she had no idea why Riverview builder Charles "Bing" Kearney changed his mind and invited her instead. (Kearney is VERY CLOSE with Sheriff David Gee and I'm not sure but suspect this could have a bit of influence on events I have highlighted in my blog)

Messages left at Kearney's office were not returned Monday.

At the fundraising event, $500 donations are suggested for each candidate. (isn't this getting redundant????)

Josh Poltilove

I just wanted to ruminate on this: WHY IS IT that the cheerful employees of Kuhn can be reached for their delighted opines but that major players such as Kuhn and Kearney canNOT? That's kinda odd, huh?? You'd think they'd want to get their position out there, eh?? AND from Wayne Garcia at Blurbex


Posted by Vox Populi at 2/20/2007 06:23:00 AM

REPOSTED MARCH 8, 2007 12:15pm

Labels: maybe going downtown julie and jason

ach: I'll have to remember to update pertaining to my conversation with Josh Poltilove. Then I see that Wayne Garcia points out that the dollar amt. (though readily accessible HERE) was left out of Tampa Trib article by Josh Poltilove. Kinda explains my conversation with Josh.....