MORE POISONING LAWSUITS
Imagine that: Below there is a case detailing how IN PRISON dinner was served and folks started acting wildly as though they had been poisoned. Wonder how many people (russell rhodes recently) have left restaurants or bars, acted or drove wildly after being POISONED and then been killed or arrested for dui while the LEO knew full well they had been poisoned. Because they are ALL in on this together.
Now, since the local Irish Republican Army Tampa has poisoned my family member TWICE on video and likely more times and is constantly interfering in their lives after progressively sterner warnings NOT TO ... there's also the local wrestler found dead after eating a pizza and meeting the IRISH KREWE. AND there's the triumphant, celebratory tattoo of Nick Schuyler which definitely has a CELTIC bent.
I guess that what happens when you grow up around renfests is that you lose your sense of REALITY VERY BADLY.
Because ... I am so going to put your ass in prison if you even bother my family enough to make me spell put your ass in prison.
Anyway ... ties to poison and murders and alcohol poisoning of teenagers trace back to the Irish Republican Army Tampa OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
Why are we harboring TERRORISTS IN TAMPA FLORIDA????
Perhaps these folks are unaware of the law working it's way through Congress.
Domestic terrorism which you are most def. guilty of yeah on video ... along with the TPD IAD is a stiff penalty.
Now, enjoy your day and fuck off.
I just wait for it.
Unlike my brand of fun yours is NEVA worth the wait.
I would say ... all that planning gone to waste but it's evident to ME that absolutely no planning goes into your idiocy.
Any old hoooo... that's a sign of lack of sense of reality. Thinking everyone is as deluded as you. I've noticed folks reading those crazy fantasy books and yabbering on and on about gods and goddesses (not that I mind that))seem to believe they are ... involved in some world that like with the latino royalty of the latin kings. Exists ONLY in their minds and their clubs.
At any rate. All of it could have been solved with a few simple questions.
But, you carry on.
It's very droll.
And I know .. cooperating with your victims would SHOW YOUR WEAKNESS.
Dude, I so know how your mind works.
And there you have it.
Results
26.
In re Moniz, BK No. 98-12803, Chapter 7 , UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2973, September 12, 2005, Decided
27.
In re Shore Co., CASE NO. TY-82-00229 CHAPTER 7, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, TYLER DIVISION, 134 B.R. 572; 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1831, October 23, 1991, Filed
28.
Stein v. State, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, 37 Ala. 123; 1861 Ala. LEXIS 38, January, 1861, Decided
29.
People v. Bemore, No. S012762. , SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, 22 Cal. 4th 809; 996 P.2d 1152; 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 840; 2000 Cal. LEXIS 3337; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4069, April 20, 2000, Decided , Rehearing Denied June 21, 2000, Reported at: 2000 Cal. LEXIS 5069 . Certiorari Denied January 8, 2001, Reported at: 2001 U.S. LEXIS 522.
30.
Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co., No. S029652. , SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, 7 Cal. 4th 125; 866 P.2d 774; 27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 316; 1994 Cal. LEXIS 11; 5 A.L.R.5th 2269; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 799; 94 Daily Journal DAR 1334, January 31, 1994, Decided
31.
Mascola v. Mascola, FA990336026S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, 2002 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1185, April 5, 2002, Decided , April 5, 2002, Filed , THIS DECISION IS UNREPORTED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO FURTHER APPELLATE REVIEW. COUNSEL IS CAUTIONED TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE STATUS OF THIS CASE.
32.
Waddell v. Shoney's, Inc., CASE No. 94-2257, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, 664 So. 2d 1134; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12905; 20 Fla. L. Weekly D 2727, December 15, 1995, Filed , Released for Publication January 4, 1996.
33.
Paden v. Murray, A99A1807. , COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, 240 Ga. App. 487; 523 S.E.2d 75; 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 1294; 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 3646, October 4, 1999, Decided , Reconsideration Denied October 21, 1999. Certiorari Applied for. Petition for Certiorari Denied February 25, 2000, Reported at: 2000 Ga. LEXIS 186.
34.
Illinois Pure Water Committee, Inc. v. Yoder, No. 70-146, Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, 6 Ill. App. 3d 659; 286 N.E.2d 155; 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2562, July 19, 1972. , July 19, 1972, Filed
35.
Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co., No. 44,783, Supreme Court of Kansas, 199 Kan. 538; 431 P.2d 518; 1967 Kan. LEXIS 423, September 6, 1967, Opinion Filed
36.
Kiser v. Phillips Pipe Line Co., No. 31,766, SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, 141 Kan. 333; 41 P.2d 1010; 1935 Kan. LEXIS 145, January, 1935, Decided , March 9, 1935, Filed
37.
Winget v. Colfax Creosoting Co., No. 93-29, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, 626 So. 2d 370; 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2932, October 6, 1993, Decided , Rehearing Refused November 12, 1993.
38.
Waning v. Me. DOT, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV-07-372, SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, 2007 Me. Super. LEXIS 211, October 12, 2007, Decided, Vacated by, Remanded by Waning v. DOT, 2008 ME 95, 2008 Me. LEXIS 96 (June 10, 2008)
39.
Ada v. Melberg, Nos. 20,013 - (104), Supreme Court of Minnesota, 135 Minn. 130; 160 N.W. 257; 1916 Minn. LEXIS 518, December 15, 1916
40.
Hawkins v. Scott's Gas of Lowry City, Inc., No. 13613, Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District, Division One, 685 S.W.2d 247; 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 3040, January 28, 1985
41.
Plath v. Schonrock, No. 99-705 , SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, 2003 MT 21; 314 Mont. 101; 64 P.3d 984; 2003 Mont. LEXIS 19, July 2, 2002, Submitted on Briefs , February 13, 2003, Decided , Rehearing Denied March 6, 2003. Released for Publication March 6, 2003. Rehearing denied by Plath v. Schonrock, 2003 Mont. LEXIS 45 (Mont., Mar. 6, 2003)
42.
Healy v. Hallenbeck-Hungerford Realty Co., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 186 A.D. 748; 174 N.Y.S. 786; 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900, March 7, 1919
43.
OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BD. v. TEXAS CTY. IRRIGATION & WATER RESOURCES ASSN., No. 56,355, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1984 OK 96; 711 P.2d 38; 1984 Okla. LEXIS 176; 88 Oil & Gas Rep. 331, December 26, 1984 , Rehearings Denied February 12, 1985.
44.
Brimner v. Reed, No. 26, April T., 1903, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 23 Pa. Super. 318; 1903 Pa. Super. LEXIS 64, April 21, 1903, Argued , October 5, 1903, Decided
45.
Ritz Car Wash v. Kastis, NO. 01-96-01251-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIRST DISTRICT, HOUSTON, 976 S.W.2d 812; 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 3499, June 11, 1998, Opinion Issued , Motion for Rehearing of Petition for Review Overruled January 7, 1999.
46.
Cooper v. Whiting Oil Co., Record No. 810668, Supreme Court of Virginia, 226 Va. 491; 311 S.E.2d 757; 1984 Va. LEXIS 287, January 20, 1984
47.
Smith v. Pittston Co., Record No. 5442, Supreme Court of Virginia, 203 Va. 711; 127 S.E.2d 79; 1962 Va. LEXIS 210, August 31, 1962
48.
Markweise v. Peck Foods Corp., No. 94-2285, COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN, 205 Wis. 2d 208; 556 N.W.2d 326; 1996 Wisc. App. LEXIS 953, May 22, 1996, Oral Argument , July 23, 1996, Decided , July 23, 1996, Opinion Filed