Two Things I need Help With OH and Joe Redner owns strip clubs
A. Why is Ellen GEDALIUS suddenly covering the elections?? And all this chatter about Joe. That's Joe Redner, the strip club owner. It's possible there is someone who has been asleep a 1000000000000000 years who doesn't know Joe owns strip clubs. LOL !!!!!!!
B. (below refers to this):"Certainly, it could create some problems," said Bruce Jacob, a law professor at Stetson University. "Members of city government could feel intimidated by the fact he's on the board."
B.I don't understand this as Mr. Jacob refers to litigation that Joe, the strip club owner (okay does EVERYONE know he has strip clubs now????????? Just making sure. Thanks, Ellen for that newsflash!) has against the City of Tampa ... is he trying to say that members of the city government can influence the federal court system here in Tampa?? NO WAY !! Yeah, Okay, I guess that's possible (well, DUH!) but I had NO idea that you should just say it out loud in the newspaper and all. They are desperate to stop Joe ....
Why ??
Why??
The answers are endless and endlessly amusing and it's going to be SO COOL to see him make them do some actual REAL STUFF !!
C. I just thought of a THIRD thing I'm bugged by but I'm happy with the title to this though feel it is a bit misleading. Can someone help me to understand what is so titillating about strip club owner Joe Redner's city council win that was NOT compelling about a mayor forcing two guys out of a job and them both running against her?? AND, one of them was forced out BECAUSE he ran against her. Now, which is more interesting??? Damn. Yeah, Okay ---- nekkid ladies are all that --- to SOME. Me? I'd rather talk about .... ANYTHING. I can see a nekkid lady anytime I want.
Redner Fighting City He Wants To Serve
By ELLEN GEDALIUS The Tampa Tribune
Published: Mar 10, 2007
TAMPA - Joe Redner is no stranger the city's legal department.
The strip club owner has battled Tampa in court numerous times, generally arguing that he has a constitutional right to open adult businesses. In turn, the city has sued Redner, arguing that his Mons Venus strip club has violated a city ordinance making it a crime for a nude dancer to be within six feet of a customer.
Most of the cases have been resolved, but Redner remains involved in four pending lawsuits with the city he now wants to represent as a council member.
Those legal entanglements present the potential for conflicts of interest should Redner be elected, and raise questions about whether a council member can work objectively with a city he is suing.
"Certainly, it could create some problems," said Bruce Jacob, a law professor at Stetson University. "Members of city government could feel intimidated by the fact he's on the board."
Redner faces incumbent council Chairwoman Gwen Miller in a March 27 runoff election for the District 1 citywide council seat.
On Friday, Redner said he was willing to drop a pending federal suit he has against the city.
In that case, Redner argues that the city has violated his constitutional rights by prohibiting him from opening an adult business in the Ybor City historic district. Filed in 2003, the suit seeks damages and attorneys fees from the city.
Redner said he plans to continue pursuing a case filed in 1996. He argues in that case that he should have been allowed to continue operating Club Flamingo in Ybor City. The case is winding its way through the appeals process - Redner lost two lower court rulings - and Redner hopes the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the suit.
The city has two outstanding suits against Redner concerning Mons Venus. In one case, filed in 1996, the city argues that Mons Venus violates city zoning rules because it is within 500 feet of a residential area and within 1,000 feet of another adult business.
In the other case, the city argues that Mons Venus violates the six-foot rule enacted in 1999 that prohibits anyone in an adult club from coming within six feet of a nude person.
If elected to the council, Redner said, he would abstain from voting on cases in which he has a conflict because doing otherwise would be unethical.
"I will not vote on adult business issues, my own or anyone else's," Redner said.
By law, council members must abstain from votes that could benefit them financially.
"Anyone who is a council member is free to have economic interests in the city," City Attorney David Smith said. "He is not free to take action as a council member in a manner that implicates those financial interests."
Smith said Redner probably would have to abstain from any issues that came up relating to allowing adult businesses to operate in historic districts.
As far as getting along with a council member who is suing the city, Smith said he would have no problem.
Jacob, the Stetson law professor, said Smith and Redner would need to be careful not to discuss any pending litigation.
"That would be highly improper," Jacob said.
Redner, for his part, says the U.S. justice system is the best in the world and has no plans to stop suing the city if he sees fit - even if he is elected to the council.
"If they do something wrong, I'm going to sue them," Redner said.
He added, "I haven't even thought about suing the city since Pam Iorio has been in office."
Reporter Ellen Gedalius can be reached at (813) 259-7679 or egedalius@tampatrib.com.